Review form for In-Situ Methods
  1. Choice of problem/topic
    2. Insignificant

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    		Critically significant
    Irrelevant
  2. Theoretical framework
    3. Not articulated

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    		Well articulated
    Irrelevant
  3. Methods
    4. Not well executed

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    		Well executed
    Irrelevant
  4. Data source(s)
    5. Inappropriate

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    		Appropriate
    Irrelevant
  5. Conclusions/Interpretations
    6. Ungrounded

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    		Wellgrounded
    Irrelevant
  6. Quality of writing/organization
    7. Unclear/unorganized

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    		Clear/well organized
    Irrelevant
  7. Contribution to field
    8. Routine

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    		Highly original
    Irrelevant
  8. Membership appeal
    9. Small audience

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    		Large audience
    Irrelevant
  9. Would you attend this session
    10. No

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    		Yes
    Irrelevant
  10. Overall Recommendation
    11. Not acceptable

    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    		Outstanding Proposal, definitely accept
    Irrelevant

     
  11. Please list any comments you have about the proposal in the following textbox:
  
 
 
  
 

  
  

  


Original Design and Development by: Yong Zhao
Review form for Division C4: Learning Environments, AERA